대광고 내신 · 주장과 필자 평가 분리 5문항

A museum committee argued that extending opening hours would make access equal for everyone. The proposal sounded generous because visitors with daytime jobs would gain more opportunities to attend. A later review, however, described the claim as incomplete. The final evening bus left before the proposed closing time, and several workers depended on that route. Longer hours could help some visitors without creating equal access for all. The review did not reject the proposal entirely. It recommended extending hours on selected days while arranging transportation information and collecting data from groups that had been overlooked. A title that simply praised equal access would repeat the committee's claim but erase the reviewer's judgment. An accurate title had to preserve both the intended benefit and the limitation identified by the review.

A museum committee argued that extending opening hours would make access equal for everyone. The proposal sounded generous because visitors with daytime jobs would gain more opportunities to attend. A later review, however, described the claim as incomplete. The final evening bus left before the proposed closing time, and several workers depended on that route. Longer hours could help some visitors without creating equal access for all. The review did not reject the proposal entirely. It recommended extending hours on selected days while arranging transportation information and collecting data from groups that had been overlooked. A title that simply praised equal access would repeat the committee's claim but erase the reviewer's judgment. An accurate title had to preserve both the intended benefit and the limitation identified by the review.

A museum committee argued that extending opening hours would make access equal for everyone. The proposal sounded generous because visitors with daytime jobs would gain more opportunities to attend. A later review, however, described the claim as incomplete. The final evening bus left before the proposed closing time, and several workers depended on that route. Longer hours could help some visitors without creating equal access for all. The review did not reject the proposal entirely. It recommended extending hours on selected days while arranging transportation information and collecting data from groups that had been overlooked. A title that simply praised equal access would repeat the committee's claim but erase the reviewer's judgment. An accurate title had to preserve both the intended benefit and the limitation identified by the review.

A museum committee argued that extending opening hours would make access equal for everyone. The proposal sounded generous because visitors with daytime jobs would gain more opportunities to attend. A later review, however, described the claim as incomplete. The final evening bus left before the proposed closing time, and several workers depended on that route. Longer hours could help some visitors without creating equal access for all. The review did not reject the proposal entirely. It recommended extending hours on selected days while arranging transportation information and collecting data from groups that had been overlooked. A title that simply praised equal access would repeat the committee's claim but erase the reviewer's judgment. An accurate title had to preserve both the intended benefit and the limitation identified by the review.

A museum committee argued that extending opening hours would make access equal for everyone. The proposal sounded generous because visitors with daytime jobs would gain more opportunities to attend. A later review, however, described the claim as incomplete. The final evening bus left before the proposed closing time, and several workers depended on that route. Longer hours could help some visitors without creating equal access for all. The review did not reject the proposal entirely. It recommended extending hours on selected days while arranging transportation information and collecting data from groups that had been overlooked. A title that simply praised equal access would repeat the committee's claim but erase the reviewer's judgment. An accurate title had to preserve both the intended benefit and the limitation identified by the review.