고3 영어 노베이스, 쉬운 문제를 맞혀도 기초가 불안한 이유 · 5문항

A town placed benches beside several bus stops. Officials expected older residents to wait more comfortably. They counted how often the benches were occupied, but they had not yet compared bus use before and after installation. A volunteer argued that frequent bench use proved that more people were taking buses. The transport officer disagreed. Some people sat down while waiting for friends or resting during a walk. Even passengers who used the benches might have taken the same buses before the benches appeared. The officer supported keeping the benches, since providing a place to sit was a worthwhile purpose in itself. However, she wanted passenger counts and information about previous travel habits before claiming an increase in bus use. The disagreement concerned the evidence for a specific conclusion, not whether comfortable waiting places had any value.

A town placed benches beside several bus stops. Officials expected older residents to wait more comfortably. They counted how often the benches were occupied, but they had not yet compared bus use before and after installation. A volunteer argued that frequent bench use proved that more people were taking buses. The transport officer disagreed. Some people sat down while waiting for friends or resting during a walk. Even passengers who used the benches might have taken the same buses before the benches appeared. The officer supported keeping the benches, since providing a place to sit was a worthwhile purpose in itself. However, she wanted passenger counts and information about previous travel habits before claiming an increase in bus use. The disagreement concerned the evidence for a specific conclusion, not whether comfortable waiting places had any value.

A town placed benches beside several bus stops. Officials expected older residents to wait more comfortably. They counted how often the benches were occupied, but they had not yet compared bus use before and after installation. A volunteer argued that frequent bench use proved that more people were taking buses. The transport officer disagreed. Some people sat down while waiting for friends or resting during a walk. Even passengers who used the benches might have taken the same buses before the benches appeared. The officer supported keeping the benches, since providing a place to sit was a worthwhile purpose in itself. However, she wanted passenger counts and information about previous travel habits before claiming an increase in bus use. The disagreement concerned the evidence for a specific conclusion, not whether comfortable waiting places had any value.

A town placed benches beside several bus stops. Officials expected older residents to wait more comfortably. They counted how often the benches were occupied, but they had not yet compared bus use before and after installation. A volunteer argued that frequent bench use proved that more people were taking buses. The transport officer disagreed. Some people sat down while waiting for friends or resting during a walk. Even passengers who used the benches might have taken the same buses before the benches appeared. The officer supported keeping the benches, since providing a place to sit was a worthwhile purpose in itself. However, she wanted passenger counts and information about previous travel habits before claiming an increase in bus use. The disagreement concerned the evidence for a specific conclusion, not whether comfortable waiting places had any value.

A town placed benches beside several bus stops. Officials expected older residents to wait more comfortably. They counted how often the benches were occupied, but they had not yet compared bus use before and after installation. A volunteer argued that frequent bench use proved that more people were taking buses. The transport officer disagreed. Some people sat down while waiting for friends or resting during a walk. Even passengers who used the benches might have taken the same buses before the benches appeared. The officer supported keeping the benches, since providing a place to sit was a worthwhile purpose in itself. However, she wanted passenger counts and information about previous travel habits before claiming an increase in bus use. The disagreement concerned the evidence for a specific conclusion, not whether comfortable waiting places had any value.