고3 영어 노베이스, 사흘 쉬었다면 밀린 문제부터 몰아서 풀어야 할까요? · 5문항

A research team paused a river survey when one sensor began producing unstable readings. After replacing it, the team did not immediately combine new measurements with the old file. They first checked the replacement against a reference instrument for two days. Only after those checks did regular collection resume. Earlier readings were retained in a separate folder because the team did not yet know which had been affected by the fault. Keeping them did not mean treating them as equally reliable. During the first week after restarting, the team collected fewer measurements per day so that staff could review unexpected changes before the next collection. Once this routine was working, they increased the number of locations visited. Their report distinguished the date when collection restarted from the date when the usual volume returned. A restart was therefore a sequence of verified steps, not a single event that erased the earlier uncertainty.

A research team paused a river survey when one sensor began producing unstable readings. After replacing it, the team did not immediately combine new measurements with the old file. They first checked the replacement against a reference instrument for two days. Only after those checks did regular collection resume. Earlier readings were retained in a separate folder because the team did not yet know which had been affected by the fault. Keeping them did not mean treating them as equally reliable. During the first week after restarting, the team collected fewer measurements per day so that staff could review unexpected changes before the next collection. Once this routine was working, they increased the number of locations visited. Their report distinguished the date when collection restarted from the date when the usual volume returned. A restart was therefore a sequence of verified steps, not a single event that erased the earlier uncertainty.

A research team paused a river survey when one sensor began producing unstable readings. After replacing it, the team did not immediately combine new measurements with the old file. They first checked the replacement against a reference instrument for two days. Only after those checks did regular collection resume. Earlier readings were retained in a separate folder because the team did not yet know which had been affected by the fault. Keeping them did not mean treating them as equally reliable. During the first week after restarting, the team collected fewer measurements per day so that staff could review unexpected changes before the next collection. Once this routine was working, they increased the number of locations visited. Their report distinguished the date when collection restarted from the date when the usual volume returned. A restart was therefore a sequence of verified steps, not a single event that erased the earlier uncertainty.

A research team paused a river survey when one sensor began producing unstable readings. After replacing it, the team did not immediately combine new measurements with the old file. They first checked the replacement against a reference instrument for two days. Only after those checks did regular collection resume. Earlier readings were retained in a separate folder because the team did not yet know which had been affected by the fault. Keeping them did not mean treating them as equally reliable. During the first week after restarting, the team collected fewer measurements per day so that staff could review unexpected changes before the next collection. Once this routine was working, they increased the number of locations visited. Their report distinguished the date when collection restarted from the date when the usual volume returned. A restart was therefore a sequence of verified steps, not a single event that erased the earlier uncertainty.

A research team paused a river survey when one sensor began producing unstable readings. After replacing it, the team did not immediately combine new measurements with the old file. They first checked the replacement against a reference instrument for two days. Only after those checks did regular collection resume. Earlier readings were retained in a separate folder because the team did not yet know which had been affected by the fault. Keeping them did not mean treating them as equally reliable. During the first week after restarting, the team collected fewer measurements per day so that staff could review unexpected changes before the next collection. Once this routine was working, they increased the number of locations visited. Their report distinguished the date when collection restarted from the date when the usual volume returned. A restart was therefore a sequence of verified steps, not a single event that erased the earlier uncertainty.