예비고1 영어, 모르는 문장을 질문할 때 ‘해석이 안 돼요’ 다음에 적을 세 가지 · 5문항

Jina and Omar were preparing a short article for their school's science display. Jina saved their first draft before they revised it. She wanted to compare changes in the argument, not merely remember the original wording. Omar initially thought the shorter final version must be better because it looked clearer on the page. Their teacher asked them to identify what each revision accomplished. Removing a repeated example made the main claim easier to see, but removing a sentence that explained an exception made the claim misleading. They restored that sentence while keeping the unnecessary repetition out. Jina then attached a note to each important change explaining the problem it addressed. The original draft remained useful as evidence of their decisions, even though it was not the version they planned to display. By comparing the two texts, they could discuss a specific revision rather than simply say that one version felt better.

Jina and Omar were preparing a short article for their school's science display. Jina saved their first draft before they revised it. She wanted to compare changes in the argument, not merely remember the original wording. Omar initially thought the shorter final version must be better because it looked clearer on the page. Their teacher asked them to identify what each revision accomplished. Removing a repeated example made the main claim easier to see, but removing a sentence that explained an exception made the claim misleading. They restored that sentence while keeping the unnecessary repetition out. Jina then attached a note to each important change explaining the problem it addressed. The original draft remained useful as evidence of their decisions, even though it was not the version they planned to display. By comparing the two texts, they could discuss a specific revision rather than simply say that one version felt better.

Jina and Omar were preparing a short article for their school's science display. Jina saved their first draft before they revised it. She wanted to compare changes in the argument, not merely remember the original wording. Omar initially thought the shorter final version must be better because it looked clearer on the page. Their teacher asked them to identify what each revision accomplished. Removing a repeated example made the main claim easier to see, but removing a sentence that explained an exception made the claim misleading. They restored that sentence while keeping the unnecessary repetition out. Jina then attached a note to each important change explaining the problem it addressed. The original draft remained useful as evidence of their decisions, even though it was not the version they planned to display. By comparing the two texts, they could discuss a specific revision rather than simply say that one version felt better.

Jina and Omar were preparing a short article for their school's science display. Jina saved their first draft before they revised it. She wanted to compare changes in the argument, not merely remember the original wording. Omar initially thought the shorter final version must be better because it looked clearer on the page. Their teacher asked them to identify what each revision accomplished. Removing a repeated example made the main claim easier to see, but removing a sentence that explained an exception made the claim misleading. They restored that sentence while keeping the unnecessary repetition out. Jina then attached a note to each important change explaining the problem it addressed. The original draft remained useful as evidence of their decisions, even though it was not the version they planned to display. By comparing the two texts, they could discuss a specific revision rather than simply say that one version felt better.

Jina and Omar were preparing a short article for their school's science display. Jina saved their first draft before they revised it. She wanted to compare changes in the argument, not merely remember the original wording. Omar initially thought the shorter final version must be better because it looked clearer on the page. Their teacher asked them to identify what each revision accomplished. Removing a repeated example made the main claim easier to see, but removing a sentence that explained an exception made the claim misleading. They restored that sentence while keeping the unnecessary repetition out. Jina then attached a note to each important change explaining the problem it addressed. The original draft remained useful as evidence of their decisions, even though it was not the version they planned to display. By comparing the two texts, they could discuss a specific revision rather than simply say that one version felt better.