대광고 영어 · 해설 없이 근거 회수 5문항

A town tested a new weekend bus route for six weeks. Passenger numbers were higher on three sunny weekends than on the three rainy ones. A quick report claimed that the route itself had caused more people to visit the market. The planning team rejected that conclusion because weather, a street festival, and changes in market hours also differed across the weeks. Instead of abandoning the trial, the team compared the same stops at similar times and recorded why each passenger was travelling. The revised data showed that the route was useful to workers before the market opened, while most festival visitors arrived later by other means. The team kept the original passenger totals, but it changed the claim those totals were used to support. The final report recommended an early service for workers and a separate study of market visitors. Clearer evidence did not come from collecting a larger number alone; it came from matching each conclusion to the group and time that the data actually described.

A town tested a new weekend bus route for six weeks. Passenger numbers were higher on three sunny weekends than on the three rainy ones. A quick report claimed that the route itself had caused more people to visit the market. The planning team rejected that conclusion because weather, a street festival, and changes in market hours also differed across the weeks. Instead of abandoning the trial, the team compared the same stops at similar times and recorded why each passenger was travelling. The revised data showed that the route was useful to workers before the market opened, while most festival visitors arrived later by other means. The team kept the original passenger totals, but it changed the claim those totals were used to support. The final report recommended an early service for workers and a separate study of market visitors. Clearer evidence did not come from collecting a larger number alone; it came from matching each conclusion to the group and time that the data actually described.

A town tested a new weekend bus route for six weeks. Passenger numbers were higher on three sunny weekends than on the three rainy ones. A quick report claimed that the route itself had caused more people to visit the market. The planning team rejected that conclusion because weather, a street festival, and changes in market hours also differed across the weeks. Instead of abandoning the trial, the team compared the same stops at similar times and recorded why each passenger was travelling. The revised data showed that the route was useful to workers before the market opened, while most festival visitors arrived later by other means. The team kept the original passenger totals, but it changed the claim those totals were used to support. The final report recommended an early service for workers and a separate study of market visitors. Clearer evidence did not come from collecting a larger number alone; it came from matching each conclusion to the group and time that the data actually described.

A town tested a new weekend bus route for six weeks. Passenger numbers were higher on three sunny weekends than on the three rainy ones. A quick report claimed that the route itself had caused more people to visit the market. The planning team rejected that conclusion because weather, a street festival, and changes in market hours also differed across the weeks. Instead of abandoning the trial, the team compared the same stops at similar times and recorded why each passenger was travelling. The revised data showed that the route was useful to workers before the market opened, while most festival visitors arrived later by other means. The team kept the original passenger totals, but it changed the claim those totals were used to support. The final report recommended an early service for workers and a separate study of market visitors. Clearer evidence did not come from collecting a larger number alone; it came from matching each conclusion to the group and time that the data actually described.

A town tested a new weekend bus route for six weeks. Passenger numbers were higher on three sunny weekends than on the three rainy ones. A quick report claimed that the route itself had caused more people to visit the market. The planning team rejected that conclusion because weather, a street festival, and changes in market hours also differed across the weeks. Instead of abandoning the trial, the team compared the same stops at similar times and recorded why each passenger was travelling. The revised data showed that the route was useful to workers before the market opened, while most festival visitors arrived later by other means. The team kept the original passenger totals, but it changed the claim those totals were used to support. The final report recommended an early service for workers and a separate study of market visitors. Clearer evidence did not come from collecting a larger number alone; it came from matching each conclusion to the group and time that the data actually described.