대광고 영어 내신 · 서로 다른 증거 분리 4문항

A community garden evaluated a new training program in two ways. In a greenhouse task, volunteers identified which seedlings needed more water. In an outdoor task, they planned where to place the seedlings and explained their choices to new members. The final report kept the two results separate. Some volunteers performed accurately in the greenhouse but could not explain their outdoor decisions. Others communicated clearly outdoors but missed early signs of water stress. If the two scores had been added immediately, these different needs would have disappeared inside one total. The coordinators therefore reviewed the evidence from each task before deciding what practice to offer next. They did not claim that either task measured every skill needed for successful gardening.

A community garden evaluated a new training program in two ways. In a greenhouse task, volunteers identified which seedlings needed more water. In an outdoor task, they planned where to place the seedlings and explained their choices to new members. The final report kept the two results separate. Some volunteers performed accurately in the greenhouse but could not explain their outdoor decisions. Others communicated clearly outdoors but missed early signs of water stress. If the two scores had been added immediately, these different needs would have disappeared inside one total. The coordinators therefore reviewed the evidence from each task before deciding what practice to offer next. They did not claim that either task measured every skill needed for successful gardening.

A community garden evaluated a new training program in two ways. In a greenhouse task, volunteers identified which seedlings needed more water. In an outdoor task, they planned where to place the seedlings and explained their choices to new members. The final report kept the two results separate. Some volunteers performed accurately in the greenhouse but could not explain their outdoor decisions. Others communicated clearly outdoors but missed early signs of water stress. If the two scores had been added immediately, these different needs would have disappeared inside one total. The coordinators therefore reviewed the evidence from each task before deciding what practice to offer next. They did not claim that either task measured every skill needed for successful gardening.

A community garden evaluated a new training program in two ways. In a greenhouse task, volunteers identified which seedlings needed more water. In an outdoor task, they planned where to place the seedlings and explained their choices to new members. The final report kept the two results separate. Some volunteers performed accurately in the greenhouse but could not explain their outdoor decisions. Others communicated clearly outdoors but missed early signs of water stress. If the two scores had been added immediately, these different needs would have disappeared inside one total. The coordinators therefore reviewed the evidence from each task before deciding what practice to offer next. They did not claim that either task measured every skill needed for successful gardening. A later group receives a high combined score, but its records show near-perfect outdoor explanations and repeated greenhouse errors under dry conditions.